Hate speech on the internet is an extremely controversial subject in the realm of free speech. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that we are dealing with hate speech that does not rise to the level of incitement or threats, I would posit that the best remedy for a pluralistic democracy to deal with such speech is to place a larger importance on education and critical thinking, rather than engage in any form of online censorship.
As mentioned in the text, the internet provides a medium for people who would otherwise be marginalized in everyday society to share their anti-social ideas and arguments. This, obviously, can be a double-edged sword. For young adults who feel they don't conform to the norms of their peers, such an outlet seems to be quite therapeutic, and seems to decrease the feeling of isolation. On the other hand, the internet also provides a forum for racist and homophobic groups.
To maintain our liberal society, it seems to be the best method by which to protect young minds from being absorbed by online hate speech is to make sure they are well educated. By continuing to teach the terrors of the holocaust, young people see what happens when anti-semtic rhetoric transforms into state action. By educating the youth about hate crimes, students are able to see that ideas can turn into violent acts. By providing students with critical thinking skills, students will be able to weigh arguments, and decide for themselves what type of political speech is most persuasive.
No comments:
Post a Comment